1.

Gas-tax funded motorized recreation clubs that violate program requirements or federal, state or local regulations should experience a reduction in future grants. Repeat violations should result in termination of funding. P. 58, Mn Office of the Legislative Auditor's Program Evaluation Report: State Funded Trails for Motorized Recreation, 2003

2.

Local government fiscal agents that disburse public funds to motorized recreation clubs should take a portion of that funding to insure that clubs and motorized recreation routes meet all program requirements and federal, state and local regulations for which the fiscal agent is responsible. Case Studies for Reforming or Abolishing Gas-Tax Funding of Motorized Recreation

3.

Use of motorized recreation license and registration fees should be prioritized to mitigate the unwanted effects of ATVs, dirt-bike motorcycles, four-wheel drive trucks, snowmobiles and motorboats. Five Standards for Protecting Minnesota from ATV Damage.

4.

Minnesota should conduct a study, like that done in Maine, to determine what proportion of greenhouse gases generated in our state are produced by snowmobiles, ATVs, dirt-bike motorcycles and motorboats. MRR Global Warming Study finds ORVs generate significant disproportion of green house gasses, 9/23/08

5.

The Minnesota legislature should end diversions of gas-tax funds ($188 million since 1994) to motorized recreation and use these funds for the repair and maintenance of  Minnesota’s roads and bridges. 2008 MRR legislation repeals gas tax funding of motorized recreation